Order:
  1.  22
    A Few Notes on the Text of Marcus Aurelius.C. R. Haines - 1914 - The Classical Review 28 (07):219-221.
  2.  19
    Fronto.C. R. Haines - 1920 - The Classical Review 34 (1-2):14-18.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  25
    Note on the Parallelism Between the Prometheus Vinctus_ of Aeschylus and the _Antigone of Sophocles.C. R. Haines - 1915 - The Classical Review 29 (01):8-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  19
    On the Chronology of the Fronto Correspondence.C. R. Haines - 1914 - Classical Quarterly 8 (02):112-.
    Owing to the illegibility of parts of the Fronto palimpsest and the carelessness of its first editor, Cardinal Mai, it was impossible, even after the critical labours of Niebuhr and his colleagues, to come to any satisfactory conclusion as to the chronology of the Letters. But the edition of S. A. Naber in 1867, which had the advantage of a fresh collation of the MS. by G. N. Du Rieu, further reinforced subsequently by a new examination of the Codex due (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  8
    Some Notes on the Text of Fronto.C. R. Haines - 1915 - Classical Quarterly 9 (01):50-.
    There are few ancient texts in a condition so mutilated and unsatisfactory as that of Fronto. Not only was the Codex containing his letters used subsequently for recording the Latin translation of the Acts of the first Council of Chalcedon, and even in one case for two writings one over the other, but there are also indications that there was an earlier writing under the Fronto text, of which Studemund found traces in Cod.Ambr1. p. 107 and Hauler on p. 251 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark